The TOTAL TRUTH Solution for a Fractured America Big Picture Answers for America's Big Problems - Rebuilding on America's Original Worldview by Leonard Ransil Section 2: Christianity vs. Rival Worldviews | ||
Chapter 10 Materialism is Irrational | ||
In contrast, they say, it is only the religious who believe in the existence of the scientifically unprovable, non-material realm of the supernatural and who stand merely on faith-based assumptions and superstitions rather than on fact. They insist that the only rational thing to do is to discard all beliefs in anything supernatural. Now, while this conclusion sounds so logical that it has enabled Secularists to hijack our public school system, it is, in fact, illogical and even irrational. This accusation requires an explanation. Logic Reveals Absurdity However, no scientist knows all there is to know about the earth, let alone in the entire physical universe. Therefore, if a scientist would insist that there are no mushrooms elsewhere in the universe, his statement would be blatantly illogical and irrational because he has violated the law of the universal negative. (Dr. D. James Kennedy provides further definition of this term.) Similarly, the only way an atheist can be absolutely certain of his belief that no Creator-God exists is if he has infinite knowledge about all existence everywhere. But then, of course, if he did have such knowledge, he would be contradicting himself (a fitting oxymoron for an atheist) because he would be God, the omniscient One. Thankfully, the Bible says that God does exist and that He rewards those who believe He exists and then diligently seek Him (Hebrews 11:6). While the atheist has the prerogative to reject this comforting thought, he can’t legitimately use logic to prove his anti-God belief. It is based on a set of assumptions; faith. The above scenario exposes the assumption that science is the only measure of what is real. That assumption is the foundation on which atheists build their house of cards. But as already demonstrated, that very assumption is a faith statement that cannot be proven scientifically. By limiting his scope of investigation to the experiential realm of the five senses, a scientist cannot prove that nothing exists beyond his five senses. This is one reason why the Bible has less than flattering words when it refers to an atheist: “A fool says in his heart ‘There is no God.’” (Psalm 14:1.) The God of the Bible is eminently logical and rational once you understand His Big Picture thinking, Total Truth, through receiving and exercising the gift of faith that He does exist. Materialism Believes Man is God As already shown, an atheistic scientist, operating as a scientist, can only believe by faith that no Creator God exists. By definition, the supernatural realm in general and theology in particular are beyond his professional scope and, therefore, expertise. And, given this obvious limitation, he has no moral authority in the capacity of a scientist to even speculate, let alone make definitive pronouncements, that evolution must be true because there is no God. Simply put, science can’t prove or disprove metaphysics and it is irrational to use it to attempt it. Therefore, Materialism/Naturalism/Atheism/Secularism/Marxism (all virtually of the same anti-God mold) is a worldview based on faith, not science. It is a naturalistic religion that rejects God’s existence and exalts man as God. Evolution Supports Materialism From that perspective, it is easy to see why Darwin’s 1859 book, The Origin of Species, became the bible of atheism. It ostensibly legitimized Materialism, scientifically and, therefore, irrefutably. The ground Materialism had lost to the logic of the universal negative was seemingly regained through its savior’s break-through discovery, the doctrine of Evolution by Natural Selection. In fact, the faith in Evolution as an established fact has become so strong in the world of professional scientists that its evangelizers have converted the majority of America’s schools into seminaries promoting Secular Humanism. The first two tenants of the Humanist Manifesto II, published in 1973, state:
Lest there be any doubt, Secular Humanists believe that Evolution is the “continuous process” that caused all that exists. Again, they cannot possibly know that for certain because they do not know all there is to know about all existence. They are not omniscient, not even as a group. For the atheistic Secular Humanist, the supposed undeniable scientific basis of Evolution trumps the Bible’s explanation of man’s origins and, therefore, discredits not only God’s existence but all else the Bible reveals and declares. If you doubt the religious evangelistic fervor that propels the faith of Secularism Humanists, consider this quote:
Morality be Damned Cataclysmic Results So the key question becomes: Is this pivotal doctrine based on provable objective science or on faith and speculation? Is Evolution a scientific fact or science fiction? Clearly, the issue of man’s origins and, therefore, his purpose and future, is a crucial question for everyone. If everything evolved from nothing, Christianity (and all other God-based worldviews) is a lie and should be discarded. Man is just a meaningless, purposeless accident who ceases at death. But if evolution is a lie, then it should be exposed by every scientist and every school teacher in America. And with that irrational smokescreen removed, Christianity would again be the logical choice on which to rest one’s future. Investigating the competing claims of Evolution vs. Biblical and Scientific Creationism will be the focus of the next chapter. While space limitations will prohibit exhausting this vast topic, some principles, guidelines, quotes and links will help you investigate the key issues in this fascinating debate. Are you any closer to deciding which worldview is safer? More help is on the way! *Professor D.M.S. Watson, one of the leading biologists and science writers of his day, demonstrated the atheistic bias behind much evolutionary thinking when he wrote: "Evolution [is] a theory universally accepted not because it can be proven by logically coherent evidence to be true, but because the only alternative, special creation, is clearly incredible."2 So it's not a question of biased religious creationists versus objective scientific evolutionists; rather, it is the biases of the Christian religion versus the biases of the religion of Secular Humanism which result in different interpretations of the same scientific data. As the anti-creationist science writer Boyce Rensberger admits:
"It's not really a question of who is biased, but which bias is the correct bias with which to be biased!"4 Enough said! 1 "J. Dunphy, “A Religion for a New Age,” The Humanist, Jan.-Feb. 1983, 23,26, cited by Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D., Refuting Evolution, (Green Forest, AZ: Master Books), 20-21. | ||