The TOTAL TRUTH Solution for a Fractured America Big Picture Answers for America's Big Problems - Rebuilding on America's Original Worldview by Leonard Ransil Section 2: Christianity vs. Rival Worldviews |
Chapter 13 Evidence for Scientific Creationism |
The Nebraska Man — Evolutionists constructed a theory about an entire race of men based on one fossilized tooth. This tooth was paraded as evidence for evolution in the 1925 Scopes trial. Heralded as the “missing link” in human evolution, this hypothesized figure was labeled the “Nebraska Man.” Scientists later learned that the tooth came from a pig.Answers in Genesis provides a more extensive list of evolutionary hoaxes. Unfortunately, a public retraction of these frauds never receives the same fanfare as their introduction because the irrational bias remains: "Evolution must be true but, as yet, it is not clear just how it happened so we must keep searching until we know." It is this irrational bias and often a corresponding worldview that drives evolutionists and, in their minds, justifies keeping the relics of these frauds in college classrooms, and false accounts and pictures in science texts on all levels. So much for scientific objectivity! Big Bang a Bust One such hoax with nine lives is the claim that the universe began when an eternal dot, no bigger than the period at the end of this sentence, unexplainably exploded some 14 billion years ago. Unfortunately for them, evolutionists have had yet another major setback in their frantic search to justify their false doctrine. With astronomical evidence mounting, top scientists now concede that matter and, therefore, the universe had a beginning. That mighty, infinite dot never existed.2 This complicates their case enormously because it requires that the supposed Big Bang (which caused all that exists) came from nothing - a scientific impossibility according to the First Law of Thermodynamics. Obviously, this is not science but a "fairy tale."3 But even if this impossibility was somehow true, evolutionists still have many inconvenient facts of science to explain, all of which fit easily into the Scientific Creation model of origins. Some questions raised by these "hard facts" (which some evolutionists condescendingly call "anomalies") demand a scientific and plausible explanation: 1) Why do the rotation of planets and moons differ from each other? In an explosion, all parts rotate in the same direction according to the scientific Law of Angular Momentum. This law trumps the Big Bang.The Institute for Creation Research provides a more extensive list of "time clocks" that indicate a young rather than an old earth, as evolution requires. The Dirty Little Secret Behind The Lie of Evolution Why are these and numerous other "time clocks" that defy the Doctrine of Evolution ignored? It is not scientifically honest to conveniently dismiss them as mere "anomalies." True science demands that they be included in any plausible and comprehensive model of origins if it is to enjoy any credibility. Anything less should not be imposed by law on our students or be paraded around as a "scientific fact." The bottom line is: the Doctrine of Evolution is a scientific fraud, a Strategy of Deception supporting a secularist worldview and agenda, as Aldous Huxley brazenly admitted. Thomas Huxley, one of the most prominent English naturalists of the 19th century, earned the nickname “Darwin’s bulldog” for actively promoting and vehemently defending Darwinism. Huxley's grandsons included Sir Julian Huxley, well known as the world’s leading evolutionist and the first director of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization and his brother, Aldous Huxley, famous for writing Brave New World. Predictably, all came from the same atheistic mold as revealed in the following quote from Aldous: "I had motives for not wanting the world to have meaning; consequently assumed it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption. The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics; he is also concerned to prove there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do. For myself, as no doubt for most of my contemporaries, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation. The liberation we desired was simultaneously liberation from a certain political and economic system and liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom."5 Astounding! This nihilist shamelessly declares that he and most of his contemporaries, not to mention his infamous family, championed the lie of Evolution that has been used to justify and fuel genocide, infanticide, abortion, racism, atheism, America's culture war and all manner of immorality "because it interfered with our sexual freedom." Simply put, he gladly prostituted science to justify in his own eyes his warped worldview. This hoax would be a laughable joke on mankind if it was not so tragic in its consequences - temporal and eternal. Additional resource on this topic: www.creationism.org. 1 Center for Reclaiming America for Christ, "Fast Facts: Creation vs. Evolution", http://www.reclaimamerica.org/pages/fastfacts/CreationEvolution.pdf, retrieved April 27, 2007. 2 University of Rochester Department of Physics and Astronomy, Astro 105: The Milky Way, "Lecture XVI: A Short Course on Cosmology", http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~afrank/A105/LectureXVI/LectureXVI.html, retrieved April 27, 2007. 3 Stephen E. Jones, "An Atheist Fairy Tale", http://bevets.com/evolution.htm#atheism, retrieved May 4, 2007. 4 National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Solar System Exploration, "Saturn: Moons", http://sse.jpl.nasa.gov/planets/profile.cfm?Object=Saturn&Display=Moons, retrieved April 27, 2007. 5 Aldous Huxley, "Confessions of a Professed Atheist," Report: Perspective on the News, Vol. 3, June, 1966, p. 19. 6 Stephen W. Hawking, "Origin of the Universe" speech, 1988, as reported by Robert Andrew Lentz, http://www.ralentz.com/old/astro/hawking-1.html, retrieved May 4, 2007. |