A TOTAL TRUTH Solution for a Fractured America Big Picture Answers for America's Big Problems - Rebuilding on America's Original Worldview by Leonard Ransil Section 2: Christianity vs. Rival Worldviews | |||||||||||||||||||||
Chapter 18 Christianity vs. New Age | |||||||||||||||||||||
New Age beliefs are very appealing to those battered by the meaninglessness and hopelessness of stark Materialism. For a New Age believer, it is more agreeable to think of oneself as both good and worthwhile rather than as a sinner doomed to hell or to be guaranteed a positive future beyond death rather than to just cease to exist. "For some, karma is a more reasonable concept than eternal damnation for the wicked. ..a belief that virtue is rewarded and sin creates suffering might lead to a belief in Karma."1 And, like all non-Christian religions, this worldview allows/requires one to eventually earn an inevitable, wonderful conclusion - even if it takes many, often miserable, reincarnated lifetimes to reach. "In the popular American television series My Name is Earl, Earl Hickey (played by Jason Lee) becomes the victim of karma but eventually realizes that he must make up for all the bad things he's done in order to stop being punished."2 Hollywood's greatly simplified version of "karma" has Earl feverishly working to end all of the plaguing results of his bad choices by doing good deeds. Predictably, no mention is made of an existence after death although New Age believers hope in and strive for eventual bliss. Of course, this hoped for "wonderful conclusion" is only reachable if Hinduism and/or Buddhism and/or New Age beliefs are, in fact, ultimately true. Remember: The whole purpose of analyzing these conflicting Worldviews is to help you decide. At the risk of over-simplifying or misrepresenting "Karma" the next three paragraphs from Wikipedia will hopefully add some light on a pivotal term in this Worldview. "Karma is a sum of all that an individual has done, is currently doing and will do. Individuals go through certain processes and accompanying experiences throughout their lives which they have chosen, and those would be based on the results of their own creations: "karma." Karma is not about retribution, vengeance, punishment or reward. Karma simply deals with what is. The effects of all deeds actively create past, present and future experiences, thus making one responsible for one's own life, and the pain and joy it brings to others. In religions that incorporate Reincarnation, karma extends through one's present life and all past and future lives as well. The contrast between Christianity and New Age Worldviews is expanded in the chart below. Some Scary ImplicationsThere are some chilling concepts in the above explanation of "Karma." For example, adherents believe they may become "lower animals" based on their actions. The practical consequence of this unprovable assumption is that animals are actually treated better than many human beings in countries like India. While cows are honored as sacred, dying beggars are ignored and left to suffer painful deaths. Giving aid and comfort is regarded by believers as harmful; others must not interfere in the suffering person's state because it is linked to his Karma. (Just why cows are revered when, presumably, they were once humans but are now in an animal state because they did not perform enough good actions to remain human, is not explained.) Fortunately for the rejected beggars, Christians like Mother Theresa believe that all humans have intrinsic dignity because they were created by a benevolent God, not accidentally formed by an indifferent cosmic Oneness. Another unsettling example is "The process view of release (moksha) from ego-consciousness (Ahamkar)…." This is an esoteric way of saying that, no matter how many times a person might reincarnate from human to grasshopper to human to pig to cow etc., his desired final end is to become an ego-less "it." Being a human being with an individual human (or animal) personality and identity is viewed as a condition that prevents the "at-one-ment" with the non-personal, cosmic "it-ness." According to this Worldview, you will no longer be you but will become part of One Big Cosmic IT! So, if this Worldview is true, you have to become a "nothing" before you can become a "something." Notice: you must devolve to an inferior "non-entity" rather than evolve to a superior "Someone." Eventually, all separateness merges into Oneness and One is All. Obviously, this is decidedly different from both the Christian and Materialistic Worldviews.
Knowing what you know so far, if you had the power to cause one Worldview to be the Real One, which would you choose? Why? | |||||||||||||||||||||